AI Deals Worth $100B Hang Over Bitcoin Miners as Revenue Remains Thin

Stock News
Sep 17

Bitcoin mining is undergoing a fundamental shift in how its value is perceived, with a widening gap between massive contract signings and actual revenue generation. Publicly listed miners have inked artificial intelligence and high-performance computing agreements totaling over $100 billion, covering more than 4 gigawatts of capacity, yet only 550 megawatts are currently generating income, translating to roughly $1.1 billion in annualized revenue.

Despite the lack of realized cash flow, capital markets are pricing in future potential. Miners with AI contracts trade at an average enterprise value-to-forward revenue multiple of 12.9 times, compared to just 3.7 times for those without such deals. This valuation premium is not rooted in technological superiority but in a scarce asset: access to grid-connected power. As data center construction faces stricter permitting hurdles and grid congestion, existing mining sites with ready-to-use electricity are being revalued, with investors paying a premium for this 'power option' even when most revenue remains theoretical.

Grid bottlenecks have become the key driver pushing up the value of power assets, as prolonged approval processes clash with outdated infrastructure. CoinShares data shows at least 225 moratoriums or restrictions on data center construction across 30 U.S. states, with 151 still in effect. New York has imposed a statewide environmental permit suspension on data centers exceeding 50 megawatts, and other regions have enacted similar measures at state and county levels. These constraints stand in stark contrast to the roughly 2,600 gigawatts of load waiting to connect to the U.S. grid. Projects completed in 2025 faced average wait times of over five years from queue entry to operation, giving miners with existing power infrastructure a significant edge over those starting from scratch.

Woofun AI data highlights the disparity: three fully leased AI data centers in Northern Virginia are valued at approximately $27 million per megawatt, while some publicly traded miners with power but no tenants are valued below $3 million per megawatt. Though conversion is costly—retrofitting a bitcoin mine for AI runs $8 million to $15 million per megawatt versus $700,000 to $1 million for bitcoin infrastructure—the economics are compelling. AI facilities generate roughly $1.5 million in annualized profit per megawatt, three times the $500,000 from bitcoin mining.

The market's reaction has been dramatic, with soaring stock prices and aggressive writedowns becoming standard. Of the 12 miners tracked by CoinShares, 10 saw share gains between 70% and 195% in the second quarter. Keel Infrastructure, formerly Bitfarms, saw its stock surge 194.4% even after ceasing bitcoin mining. Core Scientific spent $41.9 million to terminate contracts for new-generation equipment with about 15 exahash per second of computing power, leaving its remaining self-mining operations with a negative 56% gross margin. Keel went further, shutting down its remaining mining business on June 29 and expecting no mining revenue in the third quarter, which fueled a nearly 200% Q2 stock rebound.

IREN, after taking hundreds of millions in impairments, plans to essentially exit mining by December 31. Its latest quarterly AI cloud services revenue hit $70.5 million, surpassing the $66.7 million from bitcoin mining for the first time. Cipher Digital has halted new mining capex planning, expecting mining's importance to decline sharply by the end of 2027. TeraWulf is also phasing out mining facilities, with high-performance computing rentals now contributing 71% of its quarterly revenue.

The scale of hashrate loss is expanding, and these exit plans directly impact the bitcoin network's total computing power. CoinShares estimates at least 35 exahash per second of mining capacity will be shed by publicly listed miners, roughly 4.7% of the current network total of 750 exahash. IREN holds 23.2 exahash of installed capacity, while Cipher's Odessa project adds another 11.6 exahash. TeraWulf is winding down its remaining 145 megawatts of mining capacity. These company-level actions show that hashrate divestment is not isolated but a broad strategic shift across the industry.

As more miners redirect hardware toward AI and high-performance computing, the distribution of bitcoin network hashrate will see structural changes, weakening the role of public miners as major computing power providers. This loss affects not just short-term hashrate levels but could reshape the competitive landscape long-term, concentrating remaining capacity among those committed to traditional mining or with unique cost advantages.

Bitcoin price fluctuations can improve mining profitability, but they are unlikely to reverse the broader transition. Bitcoin's rebound to around $77,000 has pushed the cost per terahash per second to roughly $38, helping most public miners return to breakeven after a tough second quarter. In contrast, when bitcoin traded near $58,400 in June, the weighted average after-tax cash cost to produce one coin was about $75,500. If prices rise further, companies like Riot Platforms, MARA Holdings, HIVE Digital, and Bitdeer could expand mining operations, but their options are narrowing as AI conversion deepens. Some have locked in 15-year site leases, and Core Scientific's nearly $42 million decision to cancel mining hardware underscores the irreversibility of capital reallocation. Short-term price gains cannot offset the lure of stable long-term cash flow from AI leases, and investors favor securing recurring revenue over betting on coin price volatility.

Execution risk remains substantial, and conversion to actual revenue is the true test of valuation. Of the 4 gigawatts under contract, only 550 megawatts are generating income, meaning more than $100 billion in unfinished projects still depends on future construction, financing, and deployment. Core Scientific currently has 437 megawatts generating revenue, Cipher began collecting rent from its Black Pearl data center in August, and IREN targets $4 billion in annualized recurring operating revenue by December. CoinShares expects AI and high-performance computing revenue growth to more than double by the next reporting period. However, the risk that construction, financing, or power infrastructure may not be completed on time persists. Tens of billions still need to be invested to turn contracted megawatts into revenue-generating facilities. Those who deliver on schedule will back their high valuations with real cash flow; those who don't may continue trading on unfulfilled promise.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10