Welcome to the CITIC Prudential Fund column on micro-cap stocks. In micro-cap investing, contrarian strategies often target opportunities on the left side of the curve, seeking to capture volatility and low attention. However, before positioning for such a trade, a critical question must be addressed: how do we measure the "crowdedness" of micro-cap stocks?

Crowding signifies excessive capital concentration and highly homogenized trading activity. When a reversal occurs, it often triggers severe stampede risk. The liquidity crisis in small and micro-cap stocks before the 2024 Chinese New Year served as a stark reminder of this danger. So, how can we objectively assess the level of crowding in micro-caps using quantitative methods? Today, we will break down this complex issue.

Understanding Crowdedness: A Concept That Is Both Observable and Quantifiable

Crowdedness fundamentally measures the concentration of market capital in a specific asset class. When substantial funds flow into micro-cap stocks, driving trading activity to unusually high levels, crowding intensifies. Conversely, when capital retreats and trading volume diminishes, crowding decreases. This contrasts sharply with the "low volatility" and "low attention" metrics favored in contrarian investing, as crowding describes a state of overheating. For quantitative strategies, crowding is a vital risk-monitoring indicator. It doesn't directly signal whether to buy or sell, but it illuminates our current position: are we in a "sparsely populated area" or a "crowded room"?

Primary Indicator: Micro-Cap Turnover as a Percentage of Total Market

This is a direct and commonly used gauge for assessing crowding. We typically observe the proportion of total A-share market turnover contributed by small-cap companies as a group. Additionally, we can analyze the ratio of small-cap turnover to that of the CSI 300 index. The underlying logic for both metrics is consistent: when funds flood into micro-caps, their turnover share rises significantly; the opposite occurs during capital flight.

What does historical data reveal? Taking December 2023 as an example, calculations show that the turnover of the bottom 10% of stocks by market cap accounted for 3.9% of the entire A-share market's turnover. This figure stands at the 84th percentile since 2010, notably higher than the historical median of 2.9%. This suggests that trading enthusiasm for micro-caps was already at a historically elevated level during that period. (Data as of 2023.12.8, source: Wind. This information is for illustrative purposes only. Investment decisions require comprehensive consideration of multiple factors, and the future market is not a simple repetition of the past. This does not reflect all stages of securities market development and is for reference only.)

What conclusions can we draw from this data? The turnover ratio acts as an effective "thermometer" for crowding. When this indicator reaches a high historical percentile, it signals intense market fervor for micro-caps, warranting caution against overheating risks. However, this metric has its limitations. An increase in the turnover ratio could stem from active capital inflows boosting trading volume, but it could also occur passively if the overall market shrinks, making the micro-cap share appear larger. Therefore, it's crucial not to rely solely on absolute values but to interpret them within the broader market context.

Secondary Indicator: Pairwise Correlation – Is the Internal Structure "Herd-Like"?

While the turnover ratio measures external heat, pairwise correlation examines the internal structure of the micro-cap universe. The methodology involves pairing every stock within the micro-cap portfolio and calculating the correlation of their return series, then averaging all pairwise correlations. What does a high correlation signify? It indicates a pronounced trend of "all rising or falling together," suggesting highly synchronized capital behavior and accumulating risk. A low correlation, conversely, points to differentiated stock movements, more dispersed risk, and ongoing internal divergence.

Using micro-cap data from December 2023 as an example, the pairwise correlation for the bottom 10% market cap portfolio was 0.32. This places it at the 22nd percentile since 2010, compared to a historical median of 0.42. This suggests that even though the turnover ratio was high (external heat), the internal performance was still differentiated (acceptable internal structure), meaning risks were not uniformly concentrated. (Data as of 2023.12.8, source: Wind.)

The turnover ratio and pairwise correlation together provide a more comprehensive picture of crowding – one gauges external activity, the other internal cohesion.

A More Holistic Framework: Multi-Dimensional Crowding Monitoring

In practical quantitative research, monitoring crowding typically extends beyond just two indicators to include dimensions such as returns, trading volume, trading structure, valuation, and news sentiment. For instance, turnover amount measures trading heat, while turnover rate indicates trading activity; valuation levels reveal deviations from fundamentals, institutional participation measures capital concentration, and the proportion of margin financing balance reflects leverage participation. By standardizing and synthesizing these multiple indicators into a composite crowding score, a more robust assessment of whether micro-caps are overcrowded can be achieved.

Historical Case Study: Predicting Risk Through Crowding Metrics

The liquidity crisis in small and micro-cap stocks before the 2024 Chinese New Year is a classic example of crowding escalating from "high" to a "collapse." In retrospect, crowding indicators had already issued warning signals before the crisis erupted – the turnover ratio for these stocks was at extreme historical highs, and quantitative funds exhibited intense herding cohesion in this segment. Crowding itself doesn't directly cause declines, but it alerts us to a market in a fragile state where any external shock could trigger a sharp correction.

Practical Application of Crowding in Strategy

In quantitative investing, the value of crowding monitoring lies not in "prediction," but in "positioning." When we observe the turnover ratio at historical lows, low pairwise correlation, and valuations at low historical percentiles, it suggests micro-caps are in a low-crowding state – this could be a favorable window for contrarian investors to build left-side positions. Conversely, when the turnover ratio breaks through historical warning levels, pairwise correlation rises rapidly, and valuation reaches high historical percentiles, it indicates a high-crowding environment – warranting increased caution, position control, or waiting for crowding to dissipate before entering. Crowding and contrarian investing are essentially two sides of the same coin. Contrarian strategies seek left-side opportunities in "low-crowding" areas, while crowding monitoring helps identify risk zones of "high crowding." Combining both creates a complete decision-making framework for micro-cap investment.

Concluding Thoughts

There is no single "universal indicator" for judging whether micro-cap stocks are crowded. The turnover ratio, pairwise correlation, valuation percentiles, turnover rate – each metric is like a puzzle piece; only when assembled can we see the full picture. The advantage of quantitative methods lies in their ability to process this multi-dimensional data simultaneously, using objective rules rather than subjective feelings to make judgments. Instead of relying on "I feel it's crowded" or "I don't think it's crowded," we depend on what the data tells us. When crowding is at historical lows, it may be time for contrarian investors to pay attention; when it's at historical highs, perhaps a moment for extra vigilance. This is the quantitative perspective on crowding – observable, quantifiable, and repeatable.

Risk Disclosure: This material is for reference only. The views expressed are current views and do not represent forecasts of the future. The sectors/industries mentioned do not constitute any investment advice, do not indicate fund holdings or trading directions, and do not constitute an inevitable basis for future investment decisions of any CITIC Prudential Fund products. Due to various factors changing after the release date, CITIC Prudential Fund reserves the right to modify this information at any time without notice. All information or opinions expressed in this material do not constitute final operational recommendations for investment, legal, accounting, or tax matters, and CITIC Prudential Fund makes no guarantee regarding final operational recommendations based on the content herein. Under no circumstances shall CITIC Prudential Fund be liable for any losses incurred by anyone as a result of using any content in this material. This material is not intended to provide financial information services or constitute an offer or invitation to sell or purchase any securities or financial products, nor is it an investment opinion or recommendation regarding any company, security, or financial product. If this material reprints third-party reports or materials, the reproduced content represents only the views of that third party and does not represent the position of CITIC Prudential Fund. This material may contain "forward-looking" information based on more than just past performance. Such information may include forecasts and predictions, but no guarantee is made that any predictions will materialize. Readers are solely responsible for deciding whether to rely on the information provided in this document. The copyright of this material belongs to CITIC Prudential Fund. Without prior written authorization, no one may reproduce or copy this material in any form. For citation or publication, please attribute the source as "CITIC Prudential Fund" and do not delete or modify any content against its original meaning. Fund managers remind you of the "buyer beware" principle for fund investments. After making an investment decision, the risks arising from fund operations and net value fluctuations shall be borne by the investor. Past performance does not indicate future results, and the performance of other funds does not constitute a guarantee of the performance of any fund. Fund managers are committed to managing and using fund assets with integrity, diligence, and due care, but funds are not guaranteed to be profitable, nor are minimum returns or principal protection guaranteed. Specific investment strategies, allocation ratios, and targets will be adjusted as market conditions allow within the scope permitted by the contract. Specific information is subject to the fund's legal documents. Before investing, please carefully read the prospectus, product information summary, fund contract, and other legal documents to understand the risk-return characteristics of the relevant funds, and judge whether the fund is suitable for your risk tolerance based on your own investment objectives, time horizon, experience, and financial condition. Make your own investment decisions at your own risk. Funds carry risks; invest with caution.